Legal Opinion
Gragg v. Orange Cab Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 26, 2013No. C12-0576RSLPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE, AND DENYING LEAVE TO AMEND
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
These matters come before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint. Dkt. # 45. Plaintiff Torey Gragg alleges that defendants Orange Cab Company, Inc. and Ridecharge, Inc. violated three consumer protection statutes. The claims arise from a text message that defendants sent to plaintiff stating that a taxi cab was being dispatched to him and providing an advertising web link to download…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones v. FMA Alliance Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Gragg v. Orange Cab Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Owens-Benniefield v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- McGinity v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
- Alamaze King, et al. v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.