Legal Opinion

Cochrane v. William Penn Hotel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1939No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hiet, J.,

Claimant’s husband was killed in an accident while pei’forming work directed by defendant employer. From the judgment of the court below affirming an award of compensation, both defendant and the insurance carrier have appealed, contending that decedent’s employment was casual in character and not in the regular course of the business of his employer. There is no dispute as to the facts and, therefore, these issues are questions of law and it is for us to determine whether the underlying findings of fact or the supporting evidence (Callihan v. Montgomery, 272 Pa. 56, 115 A.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Blake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Goss Printing Press Co. v. RedmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Dunlap v. Paradise CampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Fedak v. DzialdowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butera v. Western Ice & Utilities Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Ciccocioppo v. RoccoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Dobrich v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. McCalbe v. Timothy Shanahan & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Shoup v. AMERICAN TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API