Legal Opinion

Ciccocioppo v. Rocco

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1953No. Appeal, 118PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Claimant suffered an injury from accident while working on defendant’s premises. The Referee in effect found that claimant’s employment was not casual and was in the regular course of defendant’s business. Accordingly he made an award of compensation which both the Board and the lower court affirmed. The controlling issues, as to the character of the claimant’s employment in its relation to defendant’s business, are properly before us by reason of defendant’s specific exceptions, on his appeal to the Board to basic findings of the Referee. Karoly v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Cochrane v. William Penn HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Butera v. Western Ice & Utilities Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Karoly v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Cochrane v. William Penn HotelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Plankinton v. SchurrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Jackson D. Magenau, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Ormsbee, Jr., Deceased v. Aetna Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Leidig v. Modern Home Appliance Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API