Goss Printing Press Co. v. Redmond
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiff sued in replevin and the court below made absolute a rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense. Defendant appeals.
The action was brought to recover possesion of a printing press delivered to defendant under a conditional sales contract, defendant having defaulted in payments specified in the agreement. The affidavit of defense set up a counterclaim, asserting breach of an express warranty and consequent damages in excess of the amount due, nothing more. Under these circumstances, the court below correctly entered judgment for plaintiff. The law is well…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lee-Strauss Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Bentz v. BarclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gooden & Clark v. MitchellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1941
- MacDonald v. Leverington Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Quick v. E. B. Kintner & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Deviney v. J. H. France Fire Brick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Cochrane v. William Penn HotelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.