Legal Opinion
Seaboard Terminals Corporation v. Standard Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
The plaintiffs move for a separate trial of certain issues contained in the separate defenses of the defendant, Socony Vacuum Oil Company, Inc.
The action was brought under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, for treble damages for injuries suffered by the plaintiffs resulting from an alleged conspiracy entered into by the defendants in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act 15 U.S. C.A. § 1 et seq., to destroy the businesses of the plaintiffs.
It is the law of the case, as determined by a decision of Judge Patterson (D.C. 24 F.Supp. 1018) and affirmed by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seaboard Terminals Corp. v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Seaboard Terminals Corporation v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Todd v. RussellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simon v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Meridith v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Reines Distributors, Inc. v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Momand v. Paramount Pictures Distributing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
- Woburn Degreasing Co. v. Spencer Kellogg & SonsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.