Legal Opinion
Todd v. Russell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
The history of the litigations seeking to hold the present defendants to liability is long and tortuous. Since the decision here to be made will deal with but one of the controversies between the parties, it may be of assistance to those who hereafter pass upon the remaining disputes, if what has gone before be recited at some length.
Plaintiffs Todd, Work, and Weiss, each a citizen of Ohio, are partners of the firm of J. S. Todd & Co., security dealers in Cincinnati. As such they own 5 per cent, bonds of the Ohio Joint Stock Land Bank of Cincinnati, of the par value of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wheeler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Terry v. TubmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. Mayor of Jersey CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Seaboard Terminals Corporation v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Curry v. States Marine Corp. of DelawareDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Consolidated Fisheries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.