Legal Opinion
Seaboard Terminals Corporation v. Standard Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 30, 1938PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The action is one at law for treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, to the effect that any person injured in business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the anti-trust laws may recover threefold the damages sustained. The defendants have made motions under Rule 107 of the New York Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the action on the ground that it is barred by the statute of limitations.
The action was commenced on June 29, 1936. The amended complaint shows that the plaintiffs are Maryland corporations, Seaboard Terminals…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Bluefields S. S. Co. v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Irving Nat. Bank v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Hanna v. . StedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Barbara B. Sack v. V. T. Low, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name of Bear, Stearns & Co., and Richard W. SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- Osborne v. MalloryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.