Legal Opinion
Momand v. Paramount Pictures Distributing Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 14, 1941No. 6943, 7024PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLELLAN, District Judge.
These actions were heard together upon various interlocutory matters as follows:
1. In No. 7024, a motion by the defendants “to dispose of answer of the Statute of Limitations before Defendants are Required to Answer Interrogatories and for a Stay Meanwhile.”
2. In No. 7024, a motion by the plaintiff for the production of documents.
3. In No. 7024, “Plaintiff’s Motion to Require Admission or Denial of Facts Stated in Request for Admission of Facts.”
4. In No. 6943, “Plaintiff’s Motion to Require Admission or Denial of Facts Stated in Request for Admission of Facts.”
5. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. EggenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Nekrasoff v. U. S. Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Momand v. Universal Film Exchange, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
- Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
- International Carbonic Engineering Co. v. Natural Carbonic Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.