Legal Opinion

Leibrand v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1995No. 94-416 and 94-503PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

These combined claims were either filed in or removed to the United States District Court for the District of Montana by the plaintiffs to recover the limits of liability coverage provided by the defendants pursuant to contracts of automobile liability insurance. The defendants denied that policy limits were recoverable, based on exclusions within each of the respective policies which limited recovery by a household member to the “limits of liability required by law.” Pursuant to Rule 44, M.R.Civ.R, the United States District Court, in each case, certified the following question to this Court:

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Iwen v. U.S. West DirectMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Iwen v. US West DirectMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance v. HolemanMontana Supreme Court · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API