Legal Opinion
Forsman v. United Financial Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided August 21, 2013No. CV 12-157-M-DWMPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On March 30, 2012, Plaintiffs Valerie Forsman and Lloyd Gruber (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint and Class Action Claims against United Financial Casualty Company and Progressive1 (collectively “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants breached their automobile insurance contracts and violated Montana’s “made whole” doctrine by denying their collision claims after they were in automobile accidents with at-fault third parties whose insurers paid for Plaintiffs’ damages. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c),…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Orden v. United Services Automobile Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- O'Connell v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014
- Oltz v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.District Court, D. Montana · 2018
- Great West Casualty Company v. XTO Energy, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2019
- Hardy v. City of NomeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.