Legal Opinion
State Highway Commission v. Fortune
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1958No. File 9683PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNS, Circuit Judge.
The State Highway Commission of the State of South Dakota on behalf of and in the name of the State -of South Dakota, as plaintiff, brought two separate actions in the exercise of its power of eminent domain to condemn lands in Pennington County for highway purposes for construction of an inter-state highway as a part of the Federal Interstate Highway System. In the one action the named defendants are R. A. Fortune and the Atlantic Refining Company. In the other action the named defendants are Howard Fortune, J. B. Ferguson, Gaylord H. Chezum and the Atlantic Refining…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Menlo Park v. ArtinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Duggan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- City of Bristol v. HorterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Kindley v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Schuler v. Board of SupervisorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State Highway Commission v. Hayes EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- State Highway Commission v. BloomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Hurley v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Glanzer v. St. Joseph Indian SchoolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.