Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Kelley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1994No. 17871, 17872PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice (on reassignment).

The City of Sioux Falls (City) appeals from a jury verdict in a condemnation suit. Donald D. and Daryl W. Kelley (Kelleys) appeal on the issue of prejudgment interest. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Kelleys owned a construction business in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, from the mid-1940s through the early 1970s. In the late 1960s, the brothers acquired a twenty-seven-acre tract of land located to the north side of 41st Street and to the east side of what is now known as Louise Avenue in Sioux Falls. The land was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gross v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Biegler v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. SpirySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Crisman v. Determan Chiropractic, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API