Legal Opinion

Home Fire Insurance v. Garbacz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1896No. 6611PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Yalley county. Tried below before Thompson, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Post, O. J.

This was an action in the district court for Yalley county, where the defendant in error as plaintiff was permitted to recover for the value of three mares, one mule, and one two-year-old colt, being property 'covered by the policy of insurance, which is the basis of the action.

Of the several allegations of error one only needs be noticed at this time. In the policy introduced in evidence we observe the following condition: “It is hereby understood that if the premium is not paid in cash at the time of making the application for this insurance, and a note, notes, or obligation is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phenix Ins. v. BachelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Furnas, Irish & Co. v. FrankmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Phenix Insurance v. BachelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merchants' Planters' Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1960
  3. Borsky v. National Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hooker v. Continental InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Levin v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API