Legal Opinion

Phenix Insurance v. Bachelder

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1894No. 4398PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

This case was under consideration at the January, 1891, term and a reversal of the judgment of the district court ordered for reasons stated in the opinion, which is reported in 32 Neb., at page 490, and to which reference is made for a statement of the material facts.

A rehearing was subsequently allowed on the application of the defendant in error, and the cause again submitted on its merits. . The defendant in error on this hearing practically relies upon one proposition, viz.: That by.virtue of an agreement with the insurance company he was entitled to a credit on his note for the value of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Payne v. BriggsNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Quick v. SachsseNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. RoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. GarbaczNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hamilton v. Home Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hooker v. Continental InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API