Phenix Ins. v. Bachelder
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Sarpy county. Tried below before Clarkson, J. as to the forfeiture clause: Gorton v. Ins. Co., 39 Wis., 121; Shakey v. Ins. Co., 4.4 la., 540, and eases; Am. Ins. Co. v. Story, 8 Ins. Law Jour. [Mich.], 691 and cases; Garlick v. Ins. Co., 44 la., 553; Blackerby v. Ins. Co., 15 Ins. Law Jour. [Ky.], 556; Wall v. Ins. Co., 36 N. Y., 157; Williams v. Ins. Co., 19 Mich., 451; Muhleman v. Ins. Co., 6 W. Ya., 508; Watrous v. Ins.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Sarpy county. Tried below before Clarkson, J. as to the forfeiture clause: Gorton v. Ins. Co., 39 Wis., 121; Shakey v. Ins. Co., 4.4 la., 540, and eases; Am. Ins. Co. v. Story, 8 Ins. Law Jour. [Mich.], 691 and cases; Garlick v. Ins. Co., 44 la., 553; Blackerby v. Ins. Co., 15 Ins. Law Jour. [Ky.], 556; Wall v. Ins. Co., 36 N. Y., 157; Williams v. Ins. Co., 19 Mich., 451; Muhleman v. Ins. Co., 6 W. Ya., 508; Watrous v. Ins. Co., 35 la., 582; Am. Ins. Co. v. Leonard, 80 Ind., 272; McIntyre v. Ins. Co., 13 Ins. Law Jour., 216; Thompson v. Ins. Co., 104 U. S.,…
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This is an action on a policy of fire insurance. There was a trial to a jury, which resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff". The defendant brings the case into this court by petition in error.
We are asked to reverse the case upon two grounds:
First — The failure of the defendant in error to pay his past due premium note.
Second — Failure of the insured to furnish the preliminary proofs of loss according to the terms and conditions of the policy. We will briefly examine the points in the order named.
The policy provides that “ In case the assured fails to pay the premium note, or order, at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nichols, Shepherd & Co. v. LarkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- King v. Hekla Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Palmer v. SawyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Kansas Protective Union v. WhittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Wall v. . the Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Omaha Fire Insurance v. Dierks & WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Rochester Loan & Banking Co. v. Liberty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Western Home Insurance v. RichardsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- German Insurance & Savings Institution v. KlineNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.