Borsky v. National Fire Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
From an -adverse judgment in an action on a policy of fire insurance, defendant appeals.
*179The policy covered an automobile which was destroyed by fire during the life of the policy. One of the several defenses pleaded and relied on is that, under the terms of the policy, the automobile was not covered by the policy at the time of the fire, because it was being used as a leased or rented car.
The policy contains the following clause: “Unless otherwise provided by agreement in writing added hereto, this company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any property insured hereunder: * * * (b)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phenix Ins. v. BachelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Farmers' Mutual Insurance v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Antes v. State InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Dressler v. Commonwealth Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Hagelin v. Commonwealth Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gulizia v. Royal Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Quisenberry v. National Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937