Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Continental Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1903No. 12,955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for Stanton county: Guy T. Graves, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Glanville, C.

Odom Hooker was plaintiff in the court below, and has brought this cause before us on a petition in error, seeking to reverse the judgment of the district court for Stanton county, rendered against him in his action upon an insurance policy for the value of stock killed by lightning. The parties will be designated herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they stood in the trial court. Before considering the merits of the case, it is necessary to decide one preliminary question.

Plaintiff assigns error for the giving of certain instructions by the court to the jury, and after filing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phenix Ins. v. BachelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pythian Life Ass'n v. PrestonNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Union Life Insurance v. ParkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Home Fire Insurance v. GarbaczNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Phenix Insurance v. BachelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kavanaugh v. Security Trust & Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Borsky v. National Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API