Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Knappenberger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 23, 1936No. 26681PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
It was sought in this action by plaintiff in error to secure possession and to quiet title to certain land in Seminole county.
Plaintiff claims ownership in fee simple of the land here involved (120 acres, being the W. y2 of the S, Et % and the S. E. % of the S. E. Vi of sec. 20. twp. 9 N., range 7 E. I. M. ). The lands constituted a part of plaintiff’s allotment (Seminole freedman — (Betsy IVinton — enrolled opposite No. 2168). Plaintiff avers that she never transferred or conveyed the title to said lands to any person; that she never signed any deed, mortgage, or other conveyance affecting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dyal v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Wolverine Oil Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Probert v. CaswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Fitzsimmons v. TrosperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elsey v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Gawf v. GawfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Bauder v. BauderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Hulbert v. GivensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- M-A-C Finance Co. of Tulsa v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.