Legal Opinion

M-A-C Finance Co. of Tulsa v. Parker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1965No. 40592PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Plaintiff in error as plaintiff brought in the trial court the action from which this appeal arises against the defendants there, Jim Parker and Helen Parker, then husband and wife, doing business under the name of Parker Distributors, to recover possession of certain described secondhand automobiles the title to which defendants allegedly put in plaintiff by the execution of certain “trust receipts” pursuant to provisions of a described “floor plan agreement,” or for the value of the automobiles with interest, *554.or some $32,376.11, and attorneys fees, allegedly owing to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dyal v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. City of Oklahoma City v. MeyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  3. Duncan Brothers v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Elliott v. KnappenbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Fane Development Company v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Gentry v. American Motorist Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API