Legal Opinion

MacY v. Dalton

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 12, 1994No. Civ. S-91-1320-WBS/JFMPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHUBB, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, female employees of the Mare Island Naval Shipyard who were discharged in a 1990 reduction-in-force (“RIF”), have brought this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, on the ground that their discharge was motivated by gender bias. Defendant Dalton moves for summary judgment against certain named plaintiffs pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Because the undisputed evidence establishes that the plaintiffs irrevocably elected the grievance procedure provided under their collective bargaining agreement and have…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mustafa v. IancuDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
  2. Taylor v. DamDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
  3. Facha v. CisnerosDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Rosell v. WoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. Garry Heimrich v. UsdoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API