Legal Opinion
Rosell v. Wood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 26, 2004No. 03-934 (RJL)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEON, District Judge.
Before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. The defendant Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) moves to dismiss plaintiff Richard Allen Rosell’s complaint, which alleges unlawful employment discrimination based on age and disability in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”). 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.; 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. cum § 794(a)(2000). For the following…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Phoenix Consulting, Inc. v. Republic of AngolaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Ims, P.C. v. Aida Alvarez, Administrator, United States Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Cornelius v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Mustafa v. IancuDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Koch v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Carter v. CarsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Garry Heimrich v. UsdoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.