Legal Opinion
Jay Cashman, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 4, 2009No. 06-101CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This case, which arises under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-13, finds its roots in a contract between plaintiff, Jay Cashman, Inc. (Cashman) and the United States to provide dredging services for a project known as the “New York Harbor, Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, Navigation Project Phase II, Contract 8 (Area 8)” — referred to as the Kill Van Kull 8 project or KVK 8. In a motion for partial summary judgment, plaintiff alleges, inter alia, that defendant used a stricter acceptance method than was specified by the contract, requiring…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Pew Forest Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Schortmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Tidewater Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.