Legal Opinion

Schortmann v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 19, 2010No. 06-383TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

“To every complicated problem there is a simple solution, which turns out to be wrong.”1

Various temporal limitations are interwoven into the Federal income tax system. The warp of that system is the annual accounting principle, famously described in Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359, 365, 51 S.Ct. 150, 75 L.Ed. 383 (1931), which vertically limits the calculation of income to events occurring within a given taxable year. Then, there are the wefts supplied by the limitation provisions in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.), which introduce into the weave…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Jones v. Liberty Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aziken v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Prestop Holdings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Raleigh W. Hall & Margaret E. Hall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API