Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 15, 2006No. CR 06-90225 JSWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

WHITE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion to quash subpoenas filed by Mark Fainaru-Wada (“Fainaru-Wada”) and Lance Williams (“Williams”) (collectively “Movants”). Having considered the parties’ pleadings, the brief filed by Amicus Curiae, 1 relevant legal authority, and having had the benefit of oral argument, the Court HEREBY DENIES the motion to quash. 2

BACKGROUND

This case arises out of a series of articles published in the San Francisco Chronicle (the “Chronicle”), authored by movants Mark…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API