Legal Opinion

Wittles v. Howe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1929No. 27,181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stonk,. J.

In this action to cancel a mortgage and enjoin its foreclosure, defendant Emma D. Howe appeals from the order denying her motion for amended findings or a new trial. Earle Brown is joined as a defendant because as sheriff of Hennepin county he conducted an attempted foreclosure of the mortgage. The appellant Howe will be referred to for convenience as though she were the only defendant.

Plaintiff’s ownership and therefore his right to sue are put in issue by the pleadings. There is no direct proof of his ownership. The record in that respect, from plaintiff’s standpoint, is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Madsen v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. McCart v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Anderson v. GoetzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Danielson v. TessmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Farnham v. KnobelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Berger v. KnobelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API