Legal Opinion

Berger v. Knobel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 1930No. 27,568Published

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to cancel a mortgage. There Avere findings for the plaintiff, and the defendant Knobel appeals from the order denying his motion for a neAv trial.

This is one of the Lane cases. Others are: Madsen v. Miller, 176 Minn. 55, 222 N. W. 581; Johnson v. Howe, 176 Minn. 287, 223 N. W. 148; Anderson v. Goetze, 176 Minn. 399, 223 N. W. 459; McCart v. Schreiber, 176 Minn. 496, 223 N. W. 779; Sonner v. Goetze, 177 Minn. 108, 224 N. W. 697; Wittles v. Howe, 177 Minn. 119, 224 N. W. 696; Farnham v. Goldberg, 178 Minn. 613, 228 N. W. 166; Farnham v. Knobel, 179 Minn. 83, 228 N. W. 346. The facts have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Madsen v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. McCart v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Anderson v. GoetzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Sooner v. GoetzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API