Johnson v. Howe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from the order denying a new trial.
The action was brought to restrain the foreclosure by advertisement of a mortgage upon the house and lot occupied and owned by plaintiffs.on the ground that the amount claimed to be due thereon was excessive by $1,500. The facts are these:
On May 4, 1918, Otto W. Franzen owned the property and on that day borrowed $2,500 of John A. Lane, giving therefor six promissory notes signed by himself and wife, payable to the order of Lane at his office, each bearing six per cent interest, payable semi-annually. Five of the notes were for $100 each,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- White v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Winne v. LahartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- McAuliffe v. ReuterIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Oster v. MickleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Lewis v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lundberg v. Northwestern Nat. Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Rosecky v. TomaszewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. ErlandsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Loring v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- McCart v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.