McCart v. Schreiber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action by mortgagor against mortgagee to vacate a real estate mortgage and the foreclosure thereof by advertisement. Failing in his motion for an amendment of adverse findings or a neAV trial, defendant appeals.
This is another case (see Johnson v. Howe, 176 Minn. 287, 223 N. W. 148, and also Anderson v. Goetze, 176 Minn. 399, 223 N. W. 459) Avherein the mortgagor made payment of the principal to John A. Lane, a loan broker now insolvent, only to'find that the mortgagee denied Lane’s authority to collect. The decision below was for plaintiff on the ground, not of express or even apparent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Anderson v. GoetzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Rutherford v. MorganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Springfield Savings Bank v. KjaerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wittles v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Farnham v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Danielson v. TessmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Farnham v. KnobelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Berger v. KnobelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930