Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Tessman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1929No. 27,478PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appeal by defendant Tessman'from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiffs were the owners of a lot and apartment building thereon in Minneapolis, subject to a $2,500 mortgage held by one Towne, a nonresident, represented by John A. Lane, who for many years had carried on the business of a loan broker in the city, loaning money for others on real estate security. Lane had also during that time loaned money for Tessman upon first mortgages. In December, 1924, Lane informed Tessman that two of-his mortgages, aggregating $4,400, due about the first of the year, ivould be paid, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Larson v. Lombard Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Budd v. BroenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Dwight v. LenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Madsen v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. McCart v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dehnhoff v. HeinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API