Cecilia M Lewis Et Vir v. Ray C Debord Et Ux
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BRUTINEL,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Arizona’s judgment lien statutes, A.R.S. §§ 33-961 through 33-968, require the filing of an information statement, but do not specify the consequences of failing to do so. We conclude that failing to attach an information statement to a certified copy of the judgment does not invalidate an otherwise valid lien; rather the judgment lien simply lacks priority against competing creditors who record liens against the property before the information statement is filed.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 The underlying facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch PublicArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. NavarroArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Polk v. Hon. campbell/francis Frederick KrapsArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Arizona Department of Water Resources v. McClennenArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Jorge Romero-Millan v. William BarrArizona Supreme Court · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.