Legal Opinion

Cecilia M Lewis Et Vir v. Ray C Debord Et Ux

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2015No. CV-14-0293-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BRUTINEL,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Arizona’s judgment lien statutes, A.R.S. §§ 33-961 through 33-968, require the filing of an information statement, but do not specify the consequences of failing to do so. We conclude that failing to attach an information statement to a certified copy of the judgment does not invalidate an otherwise valid lien; rather the judgment lien simply lacks priority against competing creditors who record liens against the property before the information statement is filed.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The underlying facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch PublicArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. NavarroArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Polk v. Hon. campbell/francis Frederick KrapsArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Arizona Department of Water Resources v. McClennenArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Jorge Romero-Millan v. William BarrArizona Supreme Court · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API