Legal Opinion

People's Wayne County Bank v. Stott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 34,083PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The defendant, Arthur F. Stott, reviews by certiorari an order of the circuit court of Wayne county refusing to dismiss certain garnish-, ment proceedings.

On January 20, 1926, the People’s State Bank, a Michigan corporation, began suit against Arthur F. Stott, and on March 5, 1928, recovered a judgment against him in the sum of $24,952.40. At the time of the commencement of the suit, an affidavit for writ of garnishment was filed, and it is claimed' a writ was issued in which the Stott Realty Co., a Michigan corporation, was named garnishee defendant. On April 2, 1926, the garnishee filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hebel v. Amazon InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. W. H. Warner Coal Co. v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ettelsohn v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. HastyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
  2. United Collieries, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. AT & G. CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Robert W. Irwin Co. v. Sterling, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. IssettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API