Legal Opinion

Hebel v. Amazon Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1876PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, J:

The plaintiff claimed as assignee of one Adolph Hebei to recover ten hundred and thirteen dollars for a fire loss in 1872 suffered by the assignor, and which was covered by a policy issued to the latter by the defendant, a corporation of Ohio doing business here. The company defended on the ground that previous to the assignment to the plaintiff,, and after the loss, certain creditors of the assignor commenced two garnishee suits against the company, one before a justice of the peace of Detroit and the other in the Wayne circuit court, based on the demand existing under the policy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. OwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gates v. TustenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Friedman Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API