Bristol v. Brent
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by G. E. Bristol against Noah Brent and Atchi-son, Topeka & Santa Ee Railway Company, garnishee. Judgment discharging the garnishee.- Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtErick, J.
This ease was before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal. (Bristol v. Brent, 35 Utah 213, 99 Pac. 1000.) The motion to dismiss was denied, and the parties at the last term of this court submitted the questions arising on the appeal. The appeal is- from an order or judgment discharging the garnishee, and the facts upon which the order was based are sufficiently stated by Mr. Chief Justice Straup in his opinion on the motion to dismiss the appeal, to which reference is made.
The garnishee alone appears in the action. Counsel for garnishee, stating their contention in their own language, insist…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- O'Conner v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Phoenix Bridge Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Hebel v. Amazon InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Fletcher v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re McNeelyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- Housley v. Anaconda CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Aequitas Enters., LLC v. Interstate Investment Group, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.