Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. AT & G. CO., INC.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1976No. Docket 20459PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. F. Cavanagh, J.
We are called upon to determine the rights and priorities of parties to a garnishment proceeding; we must consider novel issues of Federal and state law that are not easily resolved.
On April 21, 1971, plaintiff-appellee (garnishor) was awarded a judgment of $275.89 against principal defendant Phillips (debtor). A writ of garnishment issued and was served on garnishee-defendant-appellant (garnishee), the employer of debtor Phillips. Garnishee filed a disclosure pursuant to District Court Rule 738.6, indicating that debtor’s gross earnings were $189.88, and his mandatory deductions $26.30,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Parsons v. KnoppSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Riggs v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ladd v. Motor City Plastics Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Liedka v. LiedkaNew York Family Court · 1979
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corporation v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, Pheney Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc. v. KillopDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.