Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. of North America v. Issett

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1978No. Docket 77-3127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C. J.

Garnishee-Defendant Continental Underwriters, Inc. (hereinafter "Continental”) appeals from the denial of its motion to set aside a default judgment and from the denial of a motion for rehearing. Plaintiff filed a writ of garnishment against Continental, pursuant to GCR 1963, 738, on October 2, 1974. A deputy sheriffs return of service attests that Continental was served with the writ and supporting affidavit on October 17, 1974. Continental did not file a disclosure as required by GCR 1963, 738.6, revealing any liability of the garnishee-defendant to the principal defendant. Consequently,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fildew v. StockardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People's Wayne County Bank v. StottMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. James v. JamesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Poma v. Peoples Wayne County BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  2. Abbott v. HowardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  4. Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A. and Joanna McEwen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  5. Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A. and Joanna McEwen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API