Insurance Co. of North America v. Issett
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C. J.
Garnishee-Defendant Continental Underwriters, Inc. (hereinafter "Continental”) appeals from the denial of its motion to set aside a default judgment and from the denial of a motion for rehearing. Plaintiff filed a writ of garnishment against Continental, pursuant to GCR 1963, 738, on October 2, 1974. A deputy sheriffs return of service attests that Continental was served with the writ and supporting affidavit on October 17, 1974. Continental did not file a disclosure as required by GCR 1963, 738.6, revealing any liability of the garnishee-defendant to the principal defendant. Consequently,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fildew v. StockardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- People's Wayne County Bank v. StottMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- James v. JamesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Poma v. Peoples Wayne County BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Abbott v. HowardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A. and Joanna McEwen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A. and Joanna McEwen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010