Pennsalt Chemicals Corp. v. Dravo Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtGrim, J.
Plaintiff, Pennsalt Chemicals Corporation, has sued defendant, Dravo Corporation, for a declaratory judgment deciding that a certain patent is invalid and also asking for an injunction and damages. Plaintiff avers that defendant is the exclusive licensee of Lorenz patent No. 3,-136,834.
Plaintiff also avers that this patent covers the manufacture, sale and use of certain degassing equipment used on molten steel in the steel producing industry ; that plaintiff manufactures and sells similar degassing equipment in the steel industry as an active competitor of defendant; that defendant has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Simmonds Aerocessories, Limited, Appelant v. Elastic Stop Nut Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Michigan v. Morton Salt CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
- Channel Master Corp. v. JFD Electronics Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1967
- American Optical Co. v. CurtissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Commonwealth Development Ass'n of Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973