Legal Opinion
State of Michigan v. Morton Salt Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 11, 1966No. 4-64-Civ. 423, 4-64-Civ. 422, 4-65-Civ. 1, 4-65-Civ. 197, 4-65-Civ. 388, 4-65-Civ. 398 to 4-65-Civ. 400, 4-65-Civ. 402, 4-66-Civ. 17, 4-66-Civ. 69, and 4-66-Civ. 138PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(§5 [b], Clayton Act)
LARSON, District Judge.
In these consolidated treble damage antitrust actions this Court’s Pretrial Order of November 23, 1965, directed the parties to brief and argue several questions concerning the application of § 5(b) of the Clayton Act. Plaintiffs herein include the States of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri and Wisconsin and various governmental units within these States, and in the Milwaukee class action governmental units from other States. Defendants are companies engaged in some aspect of the salt industry. They are…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Southern Pacific Communications Company v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Goetz v. Board of Trustees, Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.