Legal Opinion

Payette v. Willis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1900No. 3673PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Lewis County. — Hon. Abraham L. Miller, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

A motion has been made by the respondent to dismiss this appeal, but, from the view we take of the case, it is unnecessary to pass upon the same. This is in the nature of a special proceeding, and the complaint, stripped of abounding verbiage, amounts to this: That the respondent is a practicing attorney; that prior *301to the 16th of December, 1896, the appellant employed the respondent to represent Mm as an attorney in a suit to set aside a deed (Payette v. Ferrier, 20 Wash. 479, 55 Pac. 629) and to reinvest title in the land mentioned in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Payette v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Curtis v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hannegan v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cook v. TibbalsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. In re HermanDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Fender v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Schultheis v. NashWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hudson v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API