Legal Opinion

Eastern Municipal Water District v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2007No. E041660PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.—

INTRODUCTION

This is an eminent domain action in which petitioner Eastern Municipal Water District (district) seeks to acquire an easement across property owned by real parties in interest 1 for the purpose of laying an underground pipeline. At the time of filing, the property was vacant land. The issue before us is whether the trial court properly determined that the “valuation date” for the property should be changed from the date on which a deposit of “probable compensation” was made by the district to the date of trial. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1263.110, 1263.120,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  4. Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Galland v. City of ClovisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Apple Valley v. Apple Valley Ranchose WaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API