Legal Opinion

State v. Visser

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2000No. 990257PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

T 1 Brad Visser entered a guilty plea in the middle of his trial for aggravated sexual assault. Visser later sought to withdraw his plea, claiming the trial judge had not strictly complied with Utah Rule of Criminal Procedure l1(e). The trial court denied Visser's motion. Visser appealed and the court of appeals reversed. We reverse the court of appeals and remand.

BACKGROUND

1 2 The State of Utah charged Brad Visser with aggravated sexual assault. Visser was seventeen years old at the time of the alleged incident. After a preliminary hearing, the juvenile court certified…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GibbonsUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. HoffUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MaguireUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. AbeytaUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BanksUtah Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. DeanUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. MoaUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. CramUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. TrippUtah Supreme Court · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API