Legal Opinion

State v. Tripp

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2010No. 20081068PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 On writ of certiorari, the State seeks review of the court of appeals' decision in State v. Tripp, 2008 UT App 388, 197 P.3d 99. The State asserts that the court of appeals erred when it reversed the trial court's denial of Defendant Susan Tripp's motion to suppress blood test results in her jury trial on a charge of automobile homicide. The court of appeals held that the State did not meet its burden to prove that her consent was voluntary, and it declined to affirm the trial court under the exigent cireumstances exception or the inevitable discovery…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. ByingtonUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. PereaUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. FullerUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API