Legal Opinion

State v. Banks

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. 19974PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Louis Banks appeals from his convictions for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute for value and possession of a dangerous weapon by a restricted person. Banks argues that the evidence on the drug charge was obtained in violation of his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and should have been suppressed; that the evidence on the weapons charge was insufficient to sustain the conviction; and that with respect to both charges, the twenty-six-month delay between his arrest and the trial court’s decision violated his…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. HarkerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. VisserUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. TodiscoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. TrafnyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. TraneUtah Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API