State v. Moa
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice DURRANT,
opinion of the Court.
INTRODUCTION
T1 This appeal encompasses two cases consolidated at the Utah Court of Appeals, each involving a separate shooting. In the first case (First Case), Charles Moa entered a no contest plea to a third degree felony, but later filed motions to withdraw that plea. At the hearing on his motions, he stipulated that his plea was taken in full compliance with rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure. The district court ultimately concluded that Mr. Moa's plea was knowingly and voluntarily made and denied his motions. On appeal to the Utah…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DeanUtah Supreme Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. ReeceUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Fort Pierce Industrial Park Phases II, III, & IV Owners Ass'n v. ShakespeareUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. RingUtah Supreme Court · 2018
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.