Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam Singh
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 7, 1992No. 92-1344PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*20SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In this case, the district court granted summary judgment on a guaranty in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).1 The guarantors appeal. We affirm the judgment below because, as a matter of law, the guaranty was free of ambiguity and the plaintiff was entitled to summary enforcement. See, e.g., Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc., 895 F.2d 46, 48-49 (1st Cir.1990) (appellate court may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any independently sufficient ground reflected in the record).
I. BACKGROUND
On December 23, 1985, Bandon Associates, a general partnership,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Juan Rivera-Muriente v. Juan Agosto-AliceaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Smart v. Gillette Co. Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Nasco, Inc. v. Public Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Gomez-Candelaria v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.