Legal Opinion

People v. Preston

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 2, 2011No. 10PDJ060Published

1Opinion of the Court

On June 28 and 29, 2011, a Hearing Board composed of

CHARLES F. GARCIA and FREDERIC (JERRY) K. CONOVER, members of the bar, and WILLIAM R. LUCERO,

the Presiding Disciplinary Judge ("PDJ"), held a C.R.C.P. 251.18 hearing. Margaret B. Funk appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel ("the People"), and James E. Preston ("Respondent") appeared pro se. The Hearing Board now issues the following "Opinion and Decision Imposing Sanctions Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.19(b)."

OPINION AND DECISION IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(b)

I. SUMMARY

The People allege Respondent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Losavio v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. In Re KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API