Legal Opinion

Bolmer v. Kocet

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 1, 1986No. 3683PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing all three counts of their complaint against the three defendants for failure to make out a prima facie case pursuant to Practice Book § 302. The issues involve the sufficiency of the evidence to make out prima facie cases regarding the plaintiffs’ claims of express contract, implied contract and unjust enrichment, arising out of a complicated real estate transaction.

The plaintiffs, Nufer B. Bolmer (hereinafter referred to as Bolmer) and R. Eugene Bolmer, who are residential real estate developers, sued the defendants, Mary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Therrien v. Safeguard Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Discover Leasing, Inc. v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Polverari v. PeattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. United Coastal Industries, Inc. v. Clearheart Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API