Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency v. Malaki
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 1963No. Civ. 10668PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Mandate to compel the Chairman of the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to sign a contract with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Sacramento and the city itself, as directed by a resolution of the board of supervisors.
The proceeding entails interpretation of certain language in article XIII, section 19, of the state Constitution. The constitutional provision was adopted in 1952 to permit a new source of financing for urban redevelopment projects. The general objectives of urban development in California were discussed in Redevelopment Agency v. Hayes, 122 Cal.App.2d 777 [266 P.2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Wotton v. BushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Rock Creek Water District v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- General Dynamics Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Sava v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- American Friends Service Committee v. ProcunierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Redevelopment Agency v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.