Legal Opinion

General Dynamics Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1958No. L. A. 24818; L. A. 24819PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiffs, General Dynamics Corporation and Aerojet-General Corporation, brought these actions to recover county and city ad valorem personal property taxes *63for the fiscal year 1953-1954. They assert that they had no taxable interest in the property. The United States intervened and alleged that the property assessed belonged to it and that it was obligated by contract to reimburse plaintiffs for the taxes paid. The trial court entered judgments for plaintiffs and intervener, and defendants appeal.

On the first Monday in March, 1953, plaintiffs were performing various research and production…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. City of Detroit v. Murray Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. United States v. Township of MuskegonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Consolidated Diesel Electric Corp. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Texas Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.California Supreme Court · 1959

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API