Legal Opinion

Street v. Second Court of Appeals

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1986No. C-5073PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether the court of appeals improperly granted mandamus relief from the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees as discovery sanctions, because such sanctions are subject to review on appeal after final judgment. Tex.R.Giv.P. 215(2)(b)(8) and (3). We hold that mandamus was not a proper remedy when there was an adequate remedy by appeal, and so conditionally grant the writ.

This proceeding arises out of an action to recover life insurance benefits filed by rela-tors Kenneth L. Cremean and Jesse Covin, as independent co-executors of the Estate of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith v. White, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  4. Lone Star Life Insurance Co. v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. MayfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API