Legal Opinion

State v. Gard

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2007No. 23920PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Rex Gard entered into a partnership to develop properties with Dr. Barry Smith and Dr. Rick Little. During the course of this partnership, Gard opened credit accounts in the names of his partners, allegedly without their permission. He also received money from the partner ship to pay the partnership’s bills, but kept the money instead. He was indicted on multiple charges of theft, forgery and a single count of conspiracy. A jury found Gard guilty of thirteen counts of theft, six counts of forgery, and the sole count of conspiracy to commit grand theft. After the judge…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BonnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. TraversieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Ronan v. Sanford HealthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Lindblom v. Sun Aviation, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Robinson-Podoll v. Harmelink, Fox, & Ravnsborg Law OfficeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API